The Same $1.25 Million, Announced a Third Time — Still Without Mentioning the Senators

Government Transparency / Credit-Claiming Source: Facebook Post DOCUMENTED PATTERN

Original source →

Related entries: FY2026 Appropriations: What Langworthy “Secured” vs. What Was Bipartisan and What “I Secured” Leaves Out: His Shared and Out-of-District Earmarks.

Why this matters

The underlying $1.25 million is real, and this fact-check already documented it once: it’s in the February 2026 accounting of FY2026 Community Project Funding as one of the earmarks Langworthy announced solely under his own name despite it being a joint request with Sens. Schumer and Gillibrand. What’s new here is the pattern — this is at least the third separate public announcement of the identical $1.25 million in six months, each time generating a fresh local news cycle, and each time still omitting the Senate co-sponsors.

Statement

Source: Facebook post, Rep. Langworthy’s official page, July 15, 2026 (permalink archived — see frontmatter)

“I was born and raised in the Southern Tier and making sure our rural communities have a strong fighter in Washington is why I stepped forward to serve. Thank you to Allegany County Board of Legislators Chairman W. Brooke Harris for your kind words and partnership that will help us deliver real results for the people of Allegany County.”

The accompanying graphic reads: “SECURED $1,250,000 FOR ALLEGANY COUNTY WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS.”

The attached video (transcribed directly by this site from the post’s audio) shows the county board chairman — identified by Langworthy’s own caption as W. Brooke Harris — speaking; the voice refers to Langworthy in the third person (“Nick,” “Congressman’s efforts”), so it is demonstrably not Langworthy. His verbatim words are the “kind words” the caption thanks him for:

“Nick works in a… system in DC that, in our opinion here in Allegany County, [means] the chips are rigged against rural communities, and that’s why it’s so important to have an advocate like Nick down in DC ensuring that rural counties, rural communities get their fair share of our nation’s resources — and through this congressionally directed funding, which would of course not have happened without Congressman’s efforts, we wouldn’t be able to complete this decades-long effort in developing the Crossroads Gateway up on Interstate 86.”

The Facts

1. This is the same money announced in January 2026 — not new funding. Langworthy’s office first announced “$1.25 million… for Allegany County Water System Improvements” on January 20-21, 2026, funding the extension of a municipal water line and a new storage tank for the “Gateway” site off I-86 in Belmont/Friendship. That announcement is already documented in this site’s February 11, 2026 appropriations entry. The July 15 Facebook post uses the identical $1,250,000 figure and the identical project description — it is a repost of the same appropriation, not a new grant.

2. There was an interim round in June 2026, too. Allegany County Board of Legislators Chairman W. Brooke Harris issued his own press release on the county’s economic development wins around June 22-26, 2026, again crediting Langworthy for the same $1.25 million alongside separately-sourced money (a $740,000 federal ARC/IIJA grant, a $500,000 state County Infrastructure Grant, and a $3,000,000 Empire State Development Pro-Housing Grant — none of which are the earmark in question). That county press release is what this July 15 Facebook post is thanking Harris for.

3. All three rounds omit that Schumer and Gillibrand co-funded it — and asked for it in the same appropriations cycle. This site’s February 2026 entry already classified the Allegany County Water System earmark as one where Langworthy’s office “omits Senate partners.” Neither the January announcement, the June county press release, nor this July 15 Facebook post mentions Sens. Schumer or Gillibrand’s parallel role in the FY2026 Congressionally Directed Spending request for the same project. The video makes the single-credit framing explicit: Chairman Harris calls the money “congressionally directed funding, which would of course not have happened without Congressman’s efforts” — attributing it solely to Langworthy, when the same “congressionally directed funding” was a joint request the two senators also filed (and publicly announced on January 8, 2026 — about twelve days before Langworthy’s own January 20 announcement).

4. This fits a documented, repeating pattern on this site. A separate July 9, 2026 entry found that Langworthy has now used identical past-tense “secured”/“delivered” framing for earmark money across multiple posts months apart (the Olean Police Department funding was flagged for a third repeat of the pattern the same week). The Allegany water money is now itself in a three-round cycle: January (initial announcement), June (county partnership angle), July (Facebook video with the county chairman’s thanks folded in).

Context

None of this means the $1.25 million isn’t real, or that Langworthy’s office did nothing to secure it — Community Project Funding requires an active member request, and his office made one. Re-announcing a funded, moving project alongside a local partner (here, the county board chairman) is also normal constituent-relations practice, not unique to Langworthy. The issue is that each of the three rounds presents the money as freshly “secured” or “delivered” without disclosing it is the same appropriation covered in this site’s prior reporting, and none discloses that two Democratic senators from the state he frequently criticizes requested the same money in the same funding cycle.

Questions This Raises

  1. Should re-announcements of previously funded earmarks make clear they are not new money?
  2. Why does Langworthy’s office continue to omit Sens. Schumer and Gillibrand’s parallel CDS request for the same $1.25 million across three separate announcements?
  3. How many of Langworthy’s other repeat-announced earmarks (see the July 9, 2026 Olean Police entry) follow this same re-promotion pattern?

Sources

Note on sourcing: The attached video’s audio has been transcribed directly by this site (Chairman Harris’s quoted remarks above). The “distinct tranche?” question is resolved: the June 26 county release (republished by the Wellsville Sun) labels the money “$1,250,000 in Federal Community Project Funding” advanced “through the federal appropriations process” — i.e., the same FY2026 House CPF earmark documented in the February 11 entry — and lists the $740K / $500K / $3M sums as separate. There is no evidence of a second, distinct $1.25M tranche. The Facebook post itself cannot be archived to Wayback (login wall); see archive_note in the frontmatter.

Last updated: July 16, 2026.